The first night of Sukkot (Feast of Booths) always falls on the full moon of the Hebrew month of Tishri. This year it was not only a full moon, it was a super-moon, because the moon's orbit brought it closer to Earth than usual. But even more special, it was also a total eclipse where I live. All of which made this a Sukkot night to remember.
My wife Caryl and I began eating in the Sukkah around 7:30, when the eclipse was just beginning. We could see the moon through the natural branches on the Sukkah roof, but after the meal we decided to move our chairs outside for a better view. The sky was not perfectly clear. There were clouds moving across the sky, which sometimes obscured the moon. Each time it appeared through a hole in the clouds, it looked a bit different as the eclipse progressed. This added to the mystique, I think.
The night itself was perfect. Not too cold, yet cool enough to be comfortable. One interesting thing we noticed was that during totality, there were no mosquitoes. Do they become less active in total darkness? Normally the bugs are most active at dawn and dusk in the twilight. As the eclipse came out of totality, there were again a few mosquitoes buzzing around us. An interesting phenomenon.
Sitting there together under the eclipse light was a romantic experience for Caryl and me, and we began talking about how long it had been since we had simply sat together in quiet sharing. Watching the eclipse became a calm, gentle meditation for both of us.
We stayed outside the whole 3.5+ hours it lasted here in Sandstone, MN. We could not take any photos because that is forbidden on a Jewish holy day, but the beautiful images of the experience are forever saved in our hearts.
Musings, insights, stories and nature observations from a Hasidic Jew living in the Great North Woods.
(And respectfully seeking to help my fellow Jews recover from "Nature Deficit Disorder.")
Showing posts with label nature study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nature study. Show all posts
Thursday, October 1, 2015
Friday, July 3, 2015
In Memory of "Big Bird," my pet rooster
![]() |
Big Bird was going on 11 years old -- a very long life for a chicken -- and was spending a lot of time in a cage anyway, because he could no longer fly up to the roost at night. But he still loved going outside with the other birds on nice days. So I let him take the risk and enjoy a more natural life as a free-range chicken. At dusk he would come back to the coop, where I would put him in his cage for the night. Last night he did not return, and stayed outside somewhere, along with a few chickens and two guineas who had taken to roosting outside instead of inside the building. I looked for him but could not find him in the dark. This morning I found the carnage, including the destroyed nest of a barred hen named Rockette who had been secretly incubating in the bushes. I knew she was broody by her behavior when she came it to eat, but had been unable to find her well-hidden nest. Last night the coyotes obviously did.
![]() |
I suppose it's a lot like letting your children run free instead of "helicoptering" them everywhere. Yes there are dangers and risks, but there are also the joys of freedom and exploration. I feel sorry for many of today's kids who don't have the "free range" experience I had back in the 1950s, when I rode my bike all over town and played for hours alone in the woods. That experience shaped my love of nature and helped make me the writer that I am today. Nowadays, parents are being arrested in some cities for letting their kids walk a couple blocks alone to the park.
(See freerangekids.com for actual cases of these ridiculous ordinances.)

Big Bird was the poster child with me in the 2013 campaign against using chickens as Kapporos, by the Alliance to End Chickens as Kapporos. (See poster above)
A different pose from the same photo shoot (My wife Caryl was the photographer that day) now immortalizes Big Bird on the cover of my latest book, Kapporos Then and Now: Toward a More Compassionate Tradition, In this book, I present the issue from both sides (practitioners and protesters), explaining why the vegan" meat is murder" argument does not work, and presenting other, more effective reasons for using money instead of chickens.
The best memorial you could give to Big Bird is to buy a copy and educate yourself about the Kapporos controversy, then pass a copy on to your local Orthodox or Hasidic rabbi. In this way, Big Bird will continue to help his fellow chickens live to lead longer, happier lives.
Tuesday, September 23, 2014
Got allergies? Don't blame the goldenrod!
![]() |
| A field of goldenrod on my land in Minnesota -- haven for many butterflies & other insects |
But the fact is, goldenrod pollen is not spread by the wind at all. This is why weather reports that include a pollen count never even mention goldenrod as a source.
![]() |
| A Goldenrod flower |
![]() |
| Ragweed plant in full bloom |
Ragweed is not particular about habitat, and will grow just about anywhere. The plant in this photo grew next to my compost pile, so it got to be over 6 feet tall from all that rich chicken manure. Along the road you might see flowering ragweed only about a foot high, eking out an existence in the hard-packed gravel on the shoulder. But once you learn to recognize it, you'll see it growing just about everywhere.
(Well, maybe not in the high desert -- but it crops up in irrigated areas like Las Vegas. In fact, according to The 30 Worst Cities for Ragweed, Las Vegas ranks #2. The top city on the list is Phoenix, Arizona.)
The stuff is very easy to pull up, so if you learn to to recognize it before it pollens out, you can at least eliminate it from your garden. But with all the acres and acres of wild areas where it can flourish, you will probably have to wait until frost kills the plants before your "hay fever" finally goes away for the season. Just don't blame your misery on the innocent goldenrod!
![]() |
| Typical distribution of ragweed pollen in the USA in September |
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
A beautiful pink and white spider!
"Even things you see as superfluous in this world -- like flies, fleas, and mosquitoes -- are part of the greater scheme of the creation of the world. 'And God saw all that God had created, and behold it was very good.'" (Midrash Exodus Rabbah 10:1)
For many people, including the words "beautiful" and "spider" together in the title of this blog post would be an oxymoron. Spiders are often seen as ugly and even fearsome creatures. But for those who can get beyond their arachnophobia, some spiders can indeed be attractive. Consider this pretty spider I spotted on a milkweed plant in my garden. (Click photos to enlarge):
I had never seen a spider like this before, and was amazed at how the pink stripes on her (yes, it is a female) abdomen exactly match the color of the flowers. I could not find this species in any of my nature books, so I googled "pink and white spider" and immediately found this page on a spider website that not only identified the species, it gave me a lot of other interesting info. Turns out my pink and white spider is nothing rare. The species is very widespread and often found on a variety of flowers. There were many, many more sites where people asked or wrote about this interesting spider.
The scientific name is Misumena vatia, and it a variety of crab spider, known as both a Milkweed Flower Crab Spider and a Yellow Goldenrod Crab Spider, among several other names. This is one of the few North American spiders that can change its color to match its surroundings -- an arachnid chameleon! After reading this, I remembered that I had seen similar spiders on goldenrod flowers, but they were yellow. Now I know they are the same species.
This is a "wait and pounce" type of spider that does not spin a web. Instead, it sits quietly on flowers, blending in and waiting for something to land. When I checked back a few hours later, the spider was still there and feeding on a yellow jacket wasp that she had caught.
Which brings me to another nature observation. This summer, I have not seen a single honeybee anywhere on my land. Not one! As you may already know, the honeybees are facing a serious health crisis and are dying out by the droves. Years ago I used to stand under my apple trees when they were in bloom and hear a constant, busy humming as the bees did their work. But no more. This year, the fruit trees were silent.
However, I am still getting pollenation on my flowers and vegetables. The niche has been taken over by various other insects, including paper wasps, yellow jackets, hornets, flies, moths, butterflies, and a variety of species of bumblebees.
This is why I do not remove wasp nests unless they are in a spot where they might be a problem for animals or humans -- such as right over a door way. Otherwise, I leave them alone. To those visitors who complain about wasps flying around, I reply that these are the insects responsible for pollenating the vegetables we harvest. Plus they are insect predators, removing a lot of destructive caterpillars from the garden. Really, the wasps and hornets are more beneficial that bothersome -- and if you don't bother them, they won't bother you.
For many people, including the words "beautiful" and "spider" together in the title of this blog post would be an oxymoron. Spiders are often seen as ugly and even fearsome creatures. But for those who can get beyond their arachnophobia, some spiders can indeed be attractive. Consider this pretty spider I spotted on a milkweed plant in my garden. (Click photos to enlarge):
I had never seen a spider like this before, and was amazed at how the pink stripes on her (yes, it is a female) abdomen exactly match the color of the flowers. I could not find this species in any of my nature books, so I googled "pink and white spider" and immediately found this page on a spider website that not only identified the species, it gave me a lot of other interesting info. Turns out my pink and white spider is nothing rare. The species is very widespread and often found on a variety of flowers. There were many, many more sites where people asked or wrote about this interesting spider.
The scientific name is Misumena vatia, and it a variety of crab spider, known as both a Milkweed Flower Crab Spider and a Yellow Goldenrod Crab Spider, among several other names. This is one of the few North American spiders that can change its color to match its surroundings -- an arachnid chameleon! After reading this, I remembered that I had seen similar spiders on goldenrod flowers, but they were yellow. Now I know they are the same species.
This is a "wait and pounce" type of spider that does not spin a web. Instead, it sits quietly on flowers, blending in and waiting for something to land. When I checked back a few hours later, the spider was still there and feeding on a yellow jacket wasp that she had caught.
Which brings me to another nature observation. This summer, I have not seen a single honeybee anywhere on my land. Not one! As you may already know, the honeybees are facing a serious health crisis and are dying out by the droves. Years ago I used to stand under my apple trees when they were in bloom and hear a constant, busy humming as the bees did their work. But no more. This year, the fruit trees were silent.
![]() |
| Hornet on milkweed |
This is why I do not remove wasp nests unless they are in a spot where they might be a problem for animals or humans -- such as right over a door way. Otherwise, I leave them alone. To those visitors who complain about wasps flying around, I reply that these are the insects responsible for pollenating the vegetables we harvest. Plus they are insect predators, removing a lot of destructive caterpillars from the garden. Really, the wasps and hornets are more beneficial that bothersome -- and if you don't bother them, they won't bother you.
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Meteors and Memories
Last night I finally got to watch the Perseid meteor showers. I say "finally" because the previous nights this year were cloudy, and last year it rained the whole time. But last night was perfect. A clear sky with no moon.
About half an hour after midnight I turned off all the house lights to avoid light pollution in the yard, then took a sleeping bag and a pillow outside and lay down on the front lawn. (My wife originally wanted to go, too, but was too tired when the time came, so she wished me well and went back to sleep.) I was soon joined by two of my cats, who came up from hunting rodents by the chicken coop to sit on me and purr.
I did not have to wait long to see a meteor. I counted 23 in an hour, several of them big bright streaks, but none to compare with the fireball my wife and I saw several years ago. But even with the excitement of seeing a meteor, it was still a slow, quiet activity, with a lot of waiting between sightings. You can't push nature, you just have to go with her pace of things. As I lay there waiting for the next one to streak across the sky, I was reminded of when we did this at summer camp many years ago. It was a pleasant time to reminisce.
I also saw what was probably a satellite moving across the sky -- or was it maybe the space station? I remember back in the late 50s and early 60s, when satellites were a new thing, there used to be schedules in the paper about when they would pass over. My father and I would go out in the yard to try and spot them. It was a big deal back then to spot a passing satellite -- way before GPS and satellite TV, long before anybody felt a need to "unplug" because nobody was as plugged in and speeded-up like today. What we watched were just little orbiting balls reflecting the sun, the very beginnings of space flight.
The night was chilly and getting downright cold -- unusual for mid-August here, but welcome, because there were no mosquitoes. The ground was getting damp though, and my old bones were feeling the lumps in the ground. so after another half hour, around 2am, I went inside and called it a night.
About half an hour after midnight I turned off all the house lights to avoid light pollution in the yard, then took a sleeping bag and a pillow outside and lay down on the front lawn. (My wife originally wanted to go, too, but was too tired when the time came, so she wished me well and went back to sleep.) I was soon joined by two of my cats, who came up from hunting rodents by the chicken coop to sit on me and purr.
I did not have to wait long to see a meteor. I counted 23 in an hour, several of them big bright streaks, but none to compare with the fireball my wife and I saw several years ago. But even with the excitement of seeing a meteor, it was still a slow, quiet activity, with a lot of waiting between sightings. You can't push nature, you just have to go with her pace of things. As I lay there waiting for the next one to streak across the sky, I was reminded of when we did this at summer camp many years ago. It was a pleasant time to reminisce.
I also saw what was probably a satellite moving across the sky -- or was it maybe the space station? I remember back in the late 50s and early 60s, when satellites were a new thing, there used to be schedules in the paper about when they would pass over. My father and I would go out in the yard to try and spot them. It was a big deal back then to spot a passing satellite -- way before GPS and satellite TV, long before anybody felt a need to "unplug" because nobody was as plugged in and speeded-up like today. What we watched were just little orbiting balls reflecting the sun, the very beginnings of space flight.
The night was chilly and getting downright cold -- unusual for mid-August here, but welcome, because there were no mosquitoes. The ground was getting damp though, and my old bones were feeling the lumps in the ground. so after another half hour, around 2am, I went inside and called it a night.
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Year of the Cicada -- again!
This year the 17-year cicadas are emerging in the eastern United States. We don't get to see any here in in Minnesota, unless a few stray westward -- Michigan seems to be the edge of the range. We have the green-veined Annual Cicada, but those do not emerge in the huge numbers of the 17-year species.
This particular insect holds a special place in my heart, because I credit them with furthering my lifelong interest in entomology.
There are several broods of cicadas that emerge in different years, because I distinctly remember seeing them in the Chicago area as a child -- but when I trace back this brood (Brood II) in increments of 17, I get 1996-1979-1962-1945. I was born in 1947 and was in high school in 1962, so the brood I remember from childhood must be a different one. I remember being in grade school at the time.
According to this chart from the University of Michigan, in Illinois there were emergences of brood X in 1956 and brood XII in 1957, which is about the time I remember seeing them. There were thousands of empty nymph cases clinging to the bark of trees after the adults had emerged, each one shaped exactly like a bug. We kids used to stick them on the backs of people as a joke -- they really do cling well to clothes! (Boys will be boys...)
Not long after that, we moved to Philadelphia, where I encountered the 1962 emergence that was of this same brood II coming out this year. At the time, we called them "17-year locusts," but they aren't really a locust, which is a type of grasshopper. I suppose people called them that because they emerged in such huge numbers, reminiscent of the biblical plagues. But these aren't as harmful. They make a lot of noise and can be a nuisance (only the males buzz, but there are a LOT of them!), but they don't strip the trees or eat all the crops like real locusts.
They do naturally prune trees, because they lay their eggs in little slits they make in the branches. When the eggs hatch, the little nymphs drop to the ground and burrow in, where they spend the next 17 years underground, feeding on roots, until the time comes to dig out and become an adult. Nobody really knows how they can tel how many years have passed -- but they do. One of nature's amazing mysteries.
![]() |
| 17-year cicada adult (Photo courtesy of USDA) |
There are several broods of cicadas that emerge in different years, because I distinctly remember seeing them in the Chicago area as a child -- but when I trace back this brood (Brood II) in increments of 17, I get 1996-1979-1962-1945. I was born in 1947 and was in high school in 1962, so the brood I remember from childhood must be a different one. I remember being in grade school at the time.
According to this chart from the University of Michigan, in Illinois there were emergences of brood X in 1956 and brood XII in 1957, which is about the time I remember seeing them. There were thousands of empty nymph cases clinging to the bark of trees after the adults had emerged, each one shaped exactly like a bug. We kids used to stick them on the backs of people as a joke -- they really do cling well to clothes! (Boys will be boys...)
Not long after that, we moved to Philadelphia, where I encountered the 1962 emergence that was of this same brood II coming out this year. At the time, we called them "17-year locusts," but they aren't really a locust, which is a type of grasshopper. I suppose people called them that because they emerged in such huge numbers, reminiscent of the biblical plagues. But these aren't as harmful. They make a lot of noise and can be a nuisance (only the males buzz, but there are a LOT of them!), but they don't strip the trees or eat all the crops like real locusts.
They do naturally prune trees, because they lay their eggs in little slits they make in the branches. When the eggs hatch, the little nymphs drop to the ground and burrow in, where they spend the next 17 years underground, feeding on roots, until the time comes to dig out and become an adult. Nobody really knows how they can tel how many years have passed -- but they do. One of nature's amazing mysteries.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Audubon Center of the North Woods sponsors new Cub Scout Pack
In March 2013, the Audubon Center of the North Woods became
the charter sponsoring organization for a new Cub Scout Pack, #185. The group includes boys and their families
from Sandstone, Finlayson, Hinckley and
Askov, Minnesota (northern Pine County).
![]() |
| Founding members of Pack 185, holding their Earth Flag |
“The demographics of Pine County are rapidly changing,” said
Rabbi Yonassan Gershom, Cubmaster of the new Pack, “and there were several
families who wanted a Scout group that would be more open to that
diversity. We intend to be
multicultural, interfaith, and disability-friendly, as well focus on nature
study and the environment. Our
programming will honor holidays and religious traditions from around the
world.”
Starting on April 3rd, Pack 185 will meet at
Finlayson Elementary School on the first and fourth Wednesdays of the month
during the school year, as well hold various activities at the Audubon Center during the summer. For
further information, contact Rabbi Gershom at 320-245-5448 or Jill Bonn at
320-279-9012.
(We are collecting aluminum cans as an ongoing fundraiser, so if you live in our area and want to donate some, please contact Rabbi Gershom to arrange pickup.)
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Are eagles nesting too early this year?
This is a still shot from the Minnesota DNR EagleCam, which is focused on a nest in Minneapolis. As you can see, there is already an eagle incubating eggs -- according to the website, there are 3 of them, laid around January 1st. You can also see that the nest was full of snow, which the eagles have covered with straw.
Given that the incubation period for a Bald Eagle is about 35 days, these eggs are long overdue to hatch -- if they ever do. January is awfully early for nesting here in Minnesota -- even now the lakes are still frozen, so it would be hard for eagles to catch fish (one of their favorite foods). They do eat carrion -- I have seen them on deer carcasses -- but would the chicks do OK on that? And what about getting chilled? Since those eggs were laid, it has gone below zero several times. I'll be watching this nest to see what happens.
Eagles are not the only birds who might be mixed up by the crazy weather this year. There was a pair of mourning doves that apparently never migrated from here because of the long, snowless, unusually warm fall. Then it went to 20 below zero (F) one night and stayed below zero for several days. I have not seen the doves since. Did they freeze to death? And today I could swear I heard a robin -- no worms for it to eat yet. Maybe it will survive on frozen crab apples still on the trees.
If climate change deniers would pay more attention to nature, it would become obvious that something is happening. A friend of mine in Pennsylvania said she has had pigeons breeding all winter, when normally they stop until spring. I read recently that birds in Europe are arriving 2-3 weeks early, long before the insects that they normally feed on have emerged. This certainly messes up the breeding season, since those birds evolved to feed their young on insects.
Back here in Minnesota, we are getting a wildly fluctuating freeze-thaw-freeze-thaw, while most of our snow is going south. In spite of the fact that there's about a foot of the stuff in my yard, we are still technically in a drought, because there was so little rain last fall that the ground under that snow is very dry. And frozen, so when the snow does melt, it is just going to run off. According to the weatherman, this leaves us with the strange possibility of having drought and flooding at the same time.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Stormy skies make the best sunrises
All of the photos on this page were take from the same hill on my land in Pine County, Minnesota, looking east. And all of them were taken on cloudy mornings.
On a clear dawn, there isn't much of a show. The sky gradually gets lighter, there's a strip of orange on the horizon, the sun comes up, and that's it. One clear day looks pretty much like another. I don't photograph many of those.
But on a cloudy morning, there is potential for some really great shots. No two cloud formations are ever the same, and the scene lasts much longer as the sun rises behind the clouds. When I see a cloudy dawn, I grab my camera and head for my favorite spot.
And there's always that one special moment when it all peaks. Capturing that moment can be a challenge, because you don't really know when it is coming. So I shoot a series of shots and then choose the best. It doesn't always pan out, but when it does, the results are spectacular. (As for the duds, well, as my father told me many years ago, even professional photographers take bad pictures -- they just don't show them to anybody. For every great pic on my blog, there were a whole lot of deletes.)
When I was a child living in the city, we used to sing a song about "rain, rain go away -- come again another day, little Johnny wants to play." From an urban perspective, rain was a nuisance that kept me from going outside and having fun. But now that I'm older and we are in the middle of a major drought, I realize that my childish wish for "rain, rain go away" would be a curse. Without rain in summer and snow storms in winter, a lot of plants and animals suffer. Including us humans.
And now comes the homily. Life, like a sunrise, varies from day to day. We say we'd like to have perpetually clear skies, but in reality that would be rather boring. It's the clouds in our lives that add some interest, even if they do sometimes rain on our parades. The storms provide the challenges. As I look back over my life, the "sunny days" are pretty much one big blur. The ones that stand out are those that -- for good or bad -- brought some excitement into my life. And even those dark days had important lessons for me to learn.
This is not to say I'm always excited to have disruptions in my life. After all, some storms can be really destructive. But, as the old saying goes, there's a silver lining in every cloud. Or, in the case of sunrises, there's always the potential for a really great peak experience. Maybe this is why just about every religion has the symbolism of moving from the darkness into the light. And every storm contains a potential rainbow.
![]() |
| "Minnesota Snowscape" |
But on a cloudy morning, there is potential for some really great shots. No two cloud formations are ever the same, and the scene lasts much longer as the sun rises behind the clouds. When I see a cloudy dawn, I grab my camera and head for my favorite spot.
And there's always that one special moment when it all peaks. Capturing that moment can be a challenge, because you don't really know when it is coming. So I shoot a series of shots and then choose the best. It doesn't always pan out, but when it does, the results are spectacular. (As for the duds, well, as my father told me many years ago, even professional photographers take bad pictures -- they just don't show them to anybody. For every great pic on my blog, there were a whole lot of deletes.)
When I was a child living in the city, we used to sing a song about "rain, rain go away -- come again another day, little Johnny wants to play." From an urban perspective, rain was a nuisance that kept me from going outside and having fun. But now that I'm older and we are in the middle of a major drought, I realize that my childish wish for "rain, rain go away" would be a curse. Without rain in summer and snow storms in winter, a lot of plants and animals suffer. Including us humans.
And now comes the homily. Life, like a sunrise, varies from day to day. We say we'd like to have perpetually clear skies, but in reality that would be rather boring. It's the clouds in our lives that add some interest, even if they do sometimes rain on our parades. The storms provide the challenges. As I look back over my life, the "sunny days" are pretty much one big blur. The ones that stand out are those that -- for good or bad -- brought some excitement into my life. And even those dark days had important lessons for me to learn.
This is not to say I'm always excited to have disruptions in my life. After all, some storms can be really destructive. But, as the old saying goes, there's a silver lining in every cloud. Or, in the case of sunrises, there's always the potential for a really great peak experience. Maybe this is why just about every religion has the symbolism of moving from the darkness into the light. And every storm contains a potential rainbow.
![]() |
| "After the Storm" |
Monday, November 5, 2012
Living with Predators on the Circle of Life
Last Saturday there was a big ruckus down at the chicken coop. When I went to investigate, I soon saw why: A Red-Tailed Hawk had killed one of my banty roosters and was feeding on the carcass in the middle of the chicken yard. No wonder everybody was so upset!
Now, I had very mixed feelings about this sight. On the one hand, I was sad to lose a good rooster. But on the other hand, it was a rather exciting nature moment. How often do you see a hawk feeding on a kill like that? And of course I didn't have a camera -- it was Shabbos (the Sabbath) so I wasn't taking pictures that day. When the hawk saw me, it flew up into a tree, and just sat there, waiting for me to leave.
Over the years, I've lost a number of roosters to various predators. Although I'm rarely there to see a wild animal go after the chickens (I did glimpse a fox once), I have seen the roosters stand up to cats and people. In a free-range flock of chickens, the roosters are always on the alert for danger. They are the sentries of the flock. There is a distinctive "predator alert" call they give, which the other chickens recognize immediately and run for cover. The rooster himself will often attack whatever is threatening them, and this is probably why so many lose their lives. The banty that the hawk was eating must have put up a terrific fight; there were feathers all over the place. But every other chicken made it safely into the shelter of the coop, where I found them all cackling and raising a huge racket.
Of course, if I kept the chickens penned up in cages all the time, this would not happen. But part of the reason I have my own chickens is because I do not want my eggs to come from factory farms. Giving the chickens freedom to scratch, peck, flock together and do all the things chickens do means a certain amount of risk. But I believe the chickens, like most people, prefer some risk rather than be locked up. Every living thing craves freedom.
There was a time when a farmer would shoot a chicken-stealing hawk as a matter of course. Nowadays, these birds are protected, which I consider a good thing. Although a hawk might take a chicken now and then, he is more likely to grab a mouse or a rat. The number of rodents eaten by raptors is huge. (I remember seeing a story about a family of Red-Tails that nested on a building near Central Park, New York. I'll bet they found plenty of rats around there!) So really, these beautiful birds are more beneficial than destructive. Death is a part of the circle of life. Although it is indeed sad to lose one of my roosters, I still prefer to try and live in peace with the hawks and other wildlife around here.
![]() |
| Red Tailed Hawk (Photo courtesy of "Wayward" on Wikipedia) |
Over the years, I've lost a number of roosters to various predators. Although I'm rarely there to see a wild animal go after the chickens (I did glimpse a fox once), I have seen the roosters stand up to cats and people. In a free-range flock of chickens, the roosters are always on the alert for danger. They are the sentries of the flock. There is a distinctive "predator alert" call they give, which the other chickens recognize immediately and run for cover. The rooster himself will often attack whatever is threatening them, and this is probably why so many lose their lives. The banty that the hawk was eating must have put up a terrific fight; there were feathers all over the place. But every other chicken made it safely into the shelter of the coop, where I found them all cackling and raising a huge racket.
Of course, if I kept the chickens penned up in cages all the time, this would not happen. But part of the reason I have my own chickens is because I do not want my eggs to come from factory farms. Giving the chickens freedom to scratch, peck, flock together and do all the things chickens do means a certain amount of risk. But I believe the chickens, like most people, prefer some risk rather than be locked up. Every living thing craves freedom.
There was a time when a farmer would shoot a chicken-stealing hawk as a matter of course. Nowadays, these birds are protected, which I consider a good thing. Although a hawk might take a chicken now and then, he is more likely to grab a mouse or a rat. The number of rodents eaten by raptors is huge. (I remember seeing a story about a family of Red-Tails that nested on a building near Central Park, New York. I'll bet they found plenty of rats around there!) So really, these beautiful birds are more beneficial than destructive. Death is a part of the circle of life. Although it is indeed sad to lose one of my roosters, I still prefer to try and live in peace with the hawks and other wildlife around here.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Why was this hornet's nest so close to the ground?
Now that the leaves are all down, you can sometimes spot interesting things that were hidden during the summer. Like this Bald-Faced Hornet's nest that has its opening less than a foot above the ground, which is probably why I couldn't find it earlier in the summer. I knew there were hornets around because I saw them, but I was looking UP into the treetops, where these nests usually are. And here there was a nest less than 30 feet from my chicken coop and practically ON the ground -- not more than six feet from where I was harvesting wild plums! I probably walked past that nest dozens of times and never even knew it was there. I didn't bother them and they didn't bother me.
In this closeup, you can clearly see where they left off and the patina of the old wood (darker area on the left) still shows. When you look at the nest itself, you also see variations in the color of the paper, with clear stripes from both the dark and light areas. This suggests to me that each wasp goes back to the same part of the coop wall, gets a load of fibers, then returns to the same area on the nest. But since I have not actually observed this, it is only guesswork.
![]() |
| Bald-faced Hornet |
This is the second time I've found a very low nest on my land -- the first was only about 3 feet off the ground, near another outbuilding. There are plenty of trees around here to nest in, so I am wondering: Do hornets often build so low, or do I have an unusual strain of these insects breeding here? Hornets only use the nest for one season, after which they all die off except the new queens, who hibernate over the winter, producing new colonies in the spring. So it is conceivable that some mutation is causing queens here to nest low. I'll have to watch for more low nests next spring.
Before I go any further, I should mention that there is NO HONEY in a nest like this, in spite of what Hollywood might think. In both cartoons and live action films (such as in Doctor Doolittle 2, where a bear climbs up to a nest for honey) hornet's nests are mistakenly confused with old-fashioned garden beehives. Climb up to one of these nests and all you will get is a bunch of stings, because hornets don't make honey. They are predators that feed their larvae on insects.
![]() |
| Back of my coop -- the lighter areas are where the hornets scraped off wood fibers for their nest. |
Where were the hornets getting their wood fibers to make this nest? From the back of my chicken coop, where they scraped the bare weathered wood clean. I've seen this behavior here before, both with hornets and wasps, but wasn't paying much attention this summer because of the heat wave. It wasn't until I found the nest that I went to look at the coop. You can very clearly see the lighter areas where they were working (click the pix to enlarge).
Interestingly, they seem to follow the vertical lines of the boards. In cases where I have actually seen hornets doing this, they are always clinging vertically, never horizontally. Most likely, they are following the grain of the wood. And if you listen very closely, you can actually hear them chewing. In fact, the first time I observed this behavior many years ago, it was by first hearing a strange scraping sound, looking for the source, then seeing a hornet busily chewing along a dead goldenrod stalk.
In this closeup, you can clearly see where they left off and the patina of the old wood (darker area on the left) still shows. When you look at the nest itself, you also see variations in the color of the paper, with clear stripes from both the dark and light areas. This suggests to me that each wasp goes back to the same part of the coop wall, gets a load of fibers, then returns to the same area on the nest. But since I have not actually observed this, it is only guesswork.
All of this brings up the question of where wasps and hornets get their wood fibers in developed areas. An old weather-worn shack like my chicken coop would never be tolerated in more upscale neighborhoods. Ditto for dead trees and other suitable debris. Maybe they use wooden fences? I have seen photos of nests that are more reddish in color, as if made from redwood.
Hornets, along with their cousins, the paper wasps, are very good for the garden -- which is where the inhabitants of this nest were hunting all summer. I watched them searching among the broccoli and cabbage leaves for those little green caterpillars. When they find one, they sting it and carry it back to their nest. Ditto for army worms and other pests, including flies, which can be found in abundance around the coop and manure pile. Plus, both hornets and wasps visit flowers to eat pollen and nectar, and seem to be moving into the niche that has been vacated by honey bees around here. I only saw two honey bees all summer, but lots of wasps were on the flowers, and we got a good harvest. So unless the nests are someplace dangerous to me or my animals, I leave these very beneficial insects alone. Besides, they give me an excellent reason NOT to paint the chicken coop!
![]() |
| Closeup of the nest after I collected it, showing the variations of colors of wood pulp used. |
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Firing Big Bird would be just the beginning for Romney
A week after the first presidential debate, Mitt Romney is still baffled as to why the Obama campaign is focusing on his "Big Bird" comment and his promise to de-fund PBS. Once again, rich-boy Romney shows how out-of-touch he is with average Americans. He is apparently unaware that there are plenty of people who can't afford cable TV to access the Discovery Channel. In many rural areas, it's not even available. Welcome to th Digital Divide.Romney is also apparently unaware what a goodwill ambassador Big Bird is around the world. He and his Sesame Street friends enter the living rooms of over 120 million viewers in more than 140 countries. Many of whom, quite frankly, are baffled as to why Romney would attack such a good show -- a show that has won more Emmys than any other children's program. (see the New York Times blog article, Romney's attack on Big Bird sows confusion abroad and feeds it at home ).
For many lower-income families, both in America and abroad, PBS is their only access to good, commercial-free, child-safe educational programming. I didn't grow up on Sesame Street (now I'm really showing my age) but my grandchildren have, and I can see the positive effects on their early learning. Which is why the Obama campaign has seized on the PBS issue. It's not just about saving Big Bird (although he has become a symbol of the debate), but about the negative values that Romney holds regarding education.
Romney has already said he wants to do away with the Department of Education, as well as eliminate Pell grants, Head Start, and low-interest student loans. He thinks we don't need any more teachers, that everyone can pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, and that if you want to go to college or start a business, you can just borrow the money from your parents. (Which, in my case, would not fund much more than a lemonade stand.) Now he wants to do away with one of the best learning tools we have.
PBS is also a good source of top-of-the-line science and nature programs like Nova and Nature, as well as specials on astronomy, physics, space exploration, evolution, and medical breakthroughs, to name a few. Some of the most amazing hummingbird footage I've ever seen came on the PBS video I got for signing up as a supporter of Nature this year. Of course, you have to believe in the validity of science to appreciate this fine programming -- which may be why Romney's more conservative supporters hate PBS. After all, these are the same people who don't believe in evolution (upon which all our DNA research is based) and want to teach creationism in our schools.
Which brings us to the real reason Romney went after PBS: to pander to the Far Right. If he is any kind of an accountant, he can't really believe that cutting PBS funding will even make a scratch in the federal budget. The government money that PBS receives is less than one percent (.00014 to be exact) of the total budget -- about $1.50 per year per person. Considering what we all get for that buck-fifty, it's a pretty good deal. However, polls have shown that many uninformed Americans think that PBS gets a huge percentage of the national budget. It seems Romney also thinks that, since he keeps linking PBS with "borrowing from China." Plus, the conservatives have been trying to shut down PBS for years. So for those who already drank the Kool-Aid, PBS is a right-wing rallying point. In fact, Romney has been harping on PBS and Big Bird since at least December 2011 (read more on that... with examples)
After the debate, Romney said that Big Bird would survive under his administration, but he'll have to have commercials ("look at Corn Flakes" in Romney's words.) Oh yeah -- let PBS become just like all the cable shows, pushing sugary drinks and nutritionless cereals, violent video games, toys the kids don't need, and relying on advertisers' ratings for what shows to include. If Romney really wants to stop the flow of US cash to China, he might start with all those cheap made-in-China toys that break within days or -- even worse -- end up being toxic.
And speaking of toxic, remember that Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, don't believe that human-made pollution is causing climate change, or that fumes from coal plants are bad for your health. (In spite of the propaganda, there is no such thing as clean coal.) Nor do they value our national parks, about which Romney has said that he "can't see the point in them." (He wants to make the Grand Canyon available for drilling and mining -- see "How might our national park system fare under President Romney? for more info.) So of course, Romney would not be too thrilled that PBS ran an excellent series on the history, beauty, and benefits of our national parks. (I suppose a guy who needs an elevator from his garage to his house doesn't do much wilderness hiking.)
One last thought: The cost of a whole year of PBS programming is equal to only six hours of defense spending. Frankly, I'd rather spend my $1.50 to keep on hiring Big Bird.
![]() |
| Cartoon courtesy of the LA Times |
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Celebrating Thoreau's 150th Yahrzeit
Today is the 150th anniversary of the death of American writer and philosopher, Henry David Thoreau (after whom this blog is named). In Jewish tradition, the anniversary of a death is called the Yahrzeit, and it is traditional to honor the life of a person whose Yahrzeit you are observing. So, I thought it would be appropriate to talk about why this blog is called "Notes from a Jewish Thoreau," and what effect the life of Thoreau has had on me. (For my nature-loving readers, that should be obvious. Unfortunately, it might not be so obvious to my Orthodox Jewish readers, who may or may not have read Thoreau in yeshiva.)
As I have written on this blog and elsewhere, I grew up as an outlier in the Jewish community. As a [then undiagnosed] person on the autism spectrum, I was always a loner who preferred being in nature to being with people. When, in high school (during the early 1960s), we read Thoreau's Walden as part of the curriculum, a whole new world opened up for me. Here was a rugged individualist much like myself, who "marched to a different drummer" and found joy in the beauty of the natural world. He also understood solitude. "What sort of space is that," Thoreau asked, "which separates a man from his fellows and makes him solitary? I have found that no exertion of the legs can bring two minds much nearer to one another." Well said! Reading Thoreau made it OK to be different.
I embraced Thoreau's philosophy of voluntary simplicity (to this day I have little regard for society's status symbols), and longed to live in the woods as he had done. Part of that fantasy was fulfilled through hiking, campcraft and nature study. Today, it is even more fulfilled by my wife and I living on a 15-acre hobby farm in Minnesota. We have a lot more amenities than Thoreau did, but his message to "simplify, simplify, simplify!" still affects our lifestyle.
Appended to my copy of Walden was Thoreau's famous essay, "Civil Disobedience." That laid the groundwork for my involvement in the anti-war movement. In the fall of 1966, I went to college and jumped head first into political activism. The local YMCA had a basement coffeehouse, where I read my protest poetry, listened to local folksingers, and met interesting people from across the country. I missed out on Woodstock, but did ride a bus to Washington D.C., where I held hands and sang "give peace a chance" with a quarter of a million flower children. Those were idealistic times, when we all believed that a new age of peace and love was just around the corner. Although it has been a struggle sometimes to keep my idealism, I have never given up hope for a better world. To this day, I remain a peacemonger and a pacifist.
Thoreau was primarily a writer, not an activist per se, but that one night of protest he spent in jail -- and what he wrote about it -- eventually sparked a whole resistance movement that continues today. Single acts of heroism have a way of reverberating down through the years. Who knows what the ripple effect will be, and how many lives will eventually be touched, through one person's willingness to break ranks and heed the voice of conscience? And would you be willing to do it?
![]() |
| Henry David Thoreau 1817-1862 |
As I have written on this blog and elsewhere, I grew up as an outlier in the Jewish community. As a [then undiagnosed] person on the autism spectrum, I was always a loner who preferred being in nature to being with people. When, in high school (during the early 1960s), we read Thoreau's Walden as part of the curriculum, a whole new world opened up for me. Here was a rugged individualist much like myself, who "marched to a different drummer" and found joy in the beauty of the natural world. He also understood solitude. "What sort of space is that," Thoreau asked, "which separates a man from his fellows and makes him solitary? I have found that no exertion of the legs can bring two minds much nearer to one another." Well said! Reading Thoreau made it OK to be different.
![]() |
| Walden Pond, Massachussetts, in 2010 (Photo by Ekhabishek, courtesy of Wikimedia) |
Appended to my copy of Walden was Thoreau's famous essay, "Civil Disobedience." That laid the groundwork for my involvement in the anti-war movement. In the fall of 1966, I went to college and jumped head first into political activism. The local YMCA had a basement coffeehouse, where I read my protest poetry, listened to local folksingers, and met interesting people from across the country. I missed out on Woodstock, but did ride a bus to Washington D.C., where I held hands and sang "give peace a chance" with a quarter of a million flower children. Those were idealistic times, when we all believed that a new age of peace and love was just around the corner. Although it has been a struggle sometimes to keep my idealism, I have never given up hope for a better world. To this day, I remain a peacemonger and a pacifist.
Thoreau was primarily a writer, not an activist per se, but that one night of protest he spent in jail -- and what he wrote about it -- eventually sparked a whole resistance movement that continues today. Single acts of heroism have a way of reverberating down through the years. Who knows what the ripple effect will be, and how many lives will eventually be touched, through one person's willingness to break ranks and heed the voice of conscience? And would you be willing to do it?
* * *
December 30, 2014: I recently ran across this interesting article, Torah and Thoreau, by Joseph Bornstein, who describes it as his "enthralling discovery that Henry David Thoreau’s ideas have their roots in Jewish consciousness." Thoreau was not Jewish, of course. He was a Transcendentalist. But Bornstein does provide a lot of parallels between Thoreau's life and philosophy and Jewish thought. A good read.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Wild Turkeys -- hard freeze tonight -- picking green tomatoes
This has to be the most cruelty-free wild turkey feather ever -- it was dropped on our dirt road by a passing flock of turkeys about a week ago. I frequently see turkeys around here, sometimes as many as 20 or more. I wish I knew where they are roosting -- then I could find lots of feathers!
This morning our dogs were raising a ruckus from inside the house, and when I looked outside, there was a crow walking down the road. I thought it was odd to see a crow taking a stroll there, but thought maybe he was looking for gravel or grains. Then I saw the turkeys following behind. At least, that's how it looked. I grabbed my camera but of course, as soon as I went outside, the crow let out a warning call and the turkeys all ran into the bush. I did get a good enough look to see that there were 5 adults and 2 older juveniles.
Was the crow actually serving as a lookout for the turkeys? It sure looked like it. And he did fly off in the same direction that they went.
On another topic, we are due for a hard frost tonight -- going down to 26F, which is probably going to break some records around here. This is really early for a killing frost. Way too cold for tomatoes to survive, even if they are covered. So I'm taking a break right now from picking and storing them all in the shed. Some will ripen, and for the rest, I've got lots of recipes using green tomatoes -- fried, pickled, in sauces and relishes. (BTW, naturally-ripening tomatoes do so from the inside out. Any tomato showing some whitish or reddish on the skin is already ripening inside and will eventually turn red.)
I've already pickled all my cukes, picked all my beans, onions, leeks and hot peppers, made sauerkraut and kimchi from the cabbages, jelly from the grapes. All in all, it was a pretty good year for the garden. Tonight we are making apple butter and applesauce, using fruit from our trees. All of this certainly helps with the winter food budget.
This morning our dogs were raising a ruckus from inside the house, and when I looked outside, there was a crow walking down the road. I thought it was odd to see a crow taking a stroll there, but thought maybe he was looking for gravel or grains. Then I saw the turkeys following behind. At least, that's how it looked. I grabbed my camera but of course, as soon as I went outside, the crow let out a warning call and the turkeys all ran into the bush. I did get a good enough look to see that there were 5 adults and 2 older juveniles.
Was the crow actually serving as a lookout for the turkeys? It sure looked like it. And he did fly off in the same direction that they went.
On another topic, we are due for a hard frost tonight -- going down to 26F, which is probably going to break some records around here. This is really early for a killing frost. Way too cold for tomatoes to survive, even if they are covered. So I'm taking a break right now from picking and storing them all in the shed. Some will ripen, and for the rest, I've got lots of recipes using green tomatoes -- fried, pickled, in sauces and relishes. (BTW, naturally-ripening tomatoes do so from the inside out. Any tomato showing some whitish or reddish on the skin is already ripening inside and will eventually turn red.)
I've already pickled all my cukes, picked all my beans, onions, leeks and hot peppers, made sauerkraut and kimchi from the cabbages, jelly from the grapes. All in all, it was a pretty good year for the garden. Tonight we are making apple butter and applesauce, using fruit from our trees. All of this certainly helps with the winter food budget.
![]() |
| Scarlet Sumac leaves against the sky Pine County, Minnesota |
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Night of the Polyphemus Moths
When I was growing up in the 1950s, we used to find lots of the Giant Silk Moths (Saturniidae), such as Cecropia, Luna, Polyphemus, Ailanthus, etc. -- even in the city, where their caterpillars fed on leaves of street trees, and the moths came fluttering to the windows. But in recent years their populations have declined, due to loss of habitat, insecticides and, some scientist believe, night flight confusion caused by light pollution. When we moved to the country in 1988, I was looking forward to maybe seeing them again, but even here, sightings are few and far between.
So you can imagine my delight when, in the spring of 2005, I found a Polyphemus cocoon under a birch tree in our yard. I put the cocoon in a bed of dead leaves (simulating its natural environment) in an empty fish tank with a screen top, and awaited the emergence of the moth.
On June 30, 2005 she emerged -- but the weather was so cold and windy (with 50 mph winds) that I could not release her. The storm continued thru Saturday night, so I attempted to release her on Sunday at dusk, which was around 10:00 PM here in the midsummer northland. I took the top off the cage, put it in the upstairs window with the screen open, and expected her to sail off into the woods the way butterflies do when I release them in the daytime. Only the moth would not fly away.
What I did not know is that a female Polyphemus does not fly until after she mates. So she just sat there in the open cage, giving off her pheromone mating call -- and wow, did it work! Around midnight I went upstairs to see if she was gone, and the room was full of polyphemus moths! The female had flown, all right, leaving behind six suitors who were still sitting in her cage and on the walls, getting high, I suppose, on the lingering smell of female moth.
That was more of these big moths than I had seen in many years. I was surprised but also pleased, because it indicated the local population was bigger than I had thought. I later read that a male can detect a female from a mile away -- or even more. Whether or not there were other females in the same radius sending out their mating scent to other males, I do not know. But six males on my land in one night was certainly beautiful! I carefully picked up each moth and put them out the window, watching them fly off into the night. Two years later, in May 2007, I found an empty Polyphemus cocoon under the same tree. I like to think it was descended from the Night of the Polyphemus Moths.
In more recent years, I have found empty cocoons of Cecropias and an occasional Polyphemus or Luna, but have not seen many of the adult moths. Still, it's nice to know they are still out there.
So you can imagine my delight when, in the spring of 2005, I found a Polyphemus cocoon under a birch tree in our yard. I put the cocoon in a bed of dead leaves (simulating its natural environment) in an empty fish tank with a screen top, and awaited the emergence of the moth.
![]() |
| Female Polyphemus Moth (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons) |
What I did not know is that a female Polyphemus does not fly until after she mates. So she just sat there in the open cage, giving off her pheromone mating call -- and wow, did it work! Around midnight I went upstairs to see if she was gone, and the room was full of polyphemus moths! The female had flown, all right, leaving behind six suitors who were still sitting in her cage and on the walls, getting high, I suppose, on the lingering smell of female moth.
That was more of these big moths than I had seen in many years. I was surprised but also pleased, because it indicated the local population was bigger than I had thought. I later read that a male can detect a female from a mile away -- or even more. Whether or not there were other females in the same radius sending out their mating scent to other males, I do not know. But six males on my land in one night was certainly beautiful! I carefully picked up each moth and put them out the window, watching them fly off into the night. Two years later, in May 2007, I found an empty Polyphemus cocoon under the same tree. I like to think it was descended from the Night of the Polyphemus Moths.
In more recent years, I have found empty cocoons of Cecropias and an occasional Polyphemus or Luna, but have not seen many of the adult moths. Still, it's nice to know they are still out there.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
To collect or not to collect -- is that really the question?
A while back, I had a conversation with a vegan who thought it was wrong for children to catch fireflies in jars. Her reasoning was, that the flashes were mating signals and we would be interrupting their love lives. "How would you like to just fall in love and then somebody grabs you and puts you in a cage?" Interesting anthropomorphism, and a perfect example of how our society confuses sex with love. But I highly doubt that fireflies actually fall in love. A Black Widow spider certainly doesn't -- she EATS her mate. So does a praying mantis sometimes. Nature in the raw is often far from romantic.
Still, the question remains: Is it ethical to allow children to collect living things from nature? My vegan friends say no, we don't need zoos or bugs in jars, the kids can learn from watching nature videos. But TV just isn't "real" in the same way as seeing the actual live animal. Things happen fast on nature shows because they edit out the long hours of waiting for the "action." But actually stalking a frog takes focus and patience!
Thinking back to my own childhood, we regularly caught fireflies, watched them flash in the jar in our rooms after lights out, then released them in the morning. I can't say what effect this had on the fireflies, but I do know that my sister and I learned a lot from watching the various bugs, toads, snakes, and other things we caught and kept in captivity for a while. From our "catch and release" activities, we discovered a lot about nature firsthand.
We learned that you can't just throw any old leaves in with the caterpillars, you need the right species of plant and a way to keep the leaves fresh (which we accomplished by covering the mouth of a small jar of water with foil, then poking holes for the plant stems. The food stayed fresh without caterpillars falling into the water and drowning.) We learned what toads, snakes and turtles eat, and how they eat it, where to find it. And we also learned how to look up and identify the things we found. By 5th grade, I was reading college-level biology books. And I must admit that I also collected insects in the usual way, mounting them on pins in boxes and attracting the attention of the high school biology teacher, who invited me to go on a museum entomology field trip. Although I no longer collect, I still love entomology.
So I find myself wondering if kids today, who are often forbidden by well-meaning parents to do this kind of hands-on learning, are really discovering very much about the outdoors. Have we gotten so politically correct about nature that we are defeating the purpose by creating a barrier between children and nature? Lately there has been a public service ad running about "discover the forest," where two kids wander into the woods, turn over a log and look at some bugs, and then Shrek come along and eats one (a bug, that is, not a child!) A cute fantasy, but in real life, how many parents would let their kids turn over a log in the first place? (If you do, please teach them to put it back as it was when they are done, so you don't destroy the homes of things that live there.)
When I was a kid, there would have been no need for such an advertisement. You could hardly keep me out of the small suburban woodlot we called our "forest." Contrast that with my 8-year-old grandson, who has been spending daycare time with us in the country this summer, and who, although he has 15 acres here to play and explore in, rarely goes outside on his own. Too boring. When he first came, he could not tell a daisy from a sunflower, but has gradually learned some basics about the outdoors. Today, we both looked up an unfamiliar purple flower and learned it was a species of vervain. When we are outside, we watch things happening in nature, such as bees pollenating squash flowers or wasps hunting caterpillars among the broccoli -- things he would never stop and watch on his own. One day, I took him into the back woods and then told him to lead me home. He did -- by following the sound of our roosters crowing and our geese honking. "See?" I said, "You won't get lost if you pay attention to what is around you."
So is it ethical to catch and collect things? I think it depends on how you do it. Certainly it is wrong to pull wings off flies or leave animals starving or dying of boredom in cages. But I see nothing wrong with letting kids keep a toad for a few days, then release it back into it own environment. When I find a snake or turtle, I bring it in the house for the kids to see. Who knows? Maybe the snake benefits spirtually from having helped a child learn more about the world. In the long run, maybe a little reptilian inconvenience now might well save that snake's home in the future.
Still, the question remains: Is it ethical to allow children to collect living things from nature? My vegan friends say no, we don't need zoos or bugs in jars, the kids can learn from watching nature videos. But TV just isn't "real" in the same way as seeing the actual live animal. Things happen fast on nature shows because they edit out the long hours of waiting for the "action." But actually stalking a frog takes focus and patience!
Thinking back to my own childhood, we regularly caught fireflies, watched them flash in the jar in our rooms after lights out, then released them in the morning. I can't say what effect this had on the fireflies, but I do know that my sister and I learned a lot from watching the various bugs, toads, snakes, and other things we caught and kept in captivity for a while. From our "catch and release" activities, we discovered a lot about nature firsthand.
We learned that you can't just throw any old leaves in with the caterpillars, you need the right species of plant and a way to keep the leaves fresh (which we accomplished by covering the mouth of a small jar of water with foil, then poking holes for the plant stems. The food stayed fresh without caterpillars falling into the water and drowning.) We learned what toads, snakes and turtles eat, and how they eat it, where to find it. And we also learned how to look up and identify the things we found. By 5th grade, I was reading college-level biology books. And I must admit that I also collected insects in the usual way, mounting them on pins in boxes and attracting the attention of the high school biology teacher, who invited me to go on a museum entomology field trip. Although I no longer collect, I still love entomology.
So I find myself wondering if kids today, who are often forbidden by well-meaning parents to do this kind of hands-on learning, are really discovering very much about the outdoors. Have we gotten so politically correct about nature that we are defeating the purpose by creating a barrier between children and nature? Lately there has been a public service ad running about "discover the forest," where two kids wander into the woods, turn over a log and look at some bugs, and then Shrek come along and eats one (a bug, that is, not a child!) A cute fantasy, but in real life, how many parents would let their kids turn over a log in the first place? (If you do, please teach them to put it back as it was when they are done, so you don't destroy the homes of things that live there.)
When I was a kid, there would have been no need for such an advertisement. You could hardly keep me out of the small suburban woodlot we called our "forest." Contrast that with my 8-year-old grandson, who has been spending daycare time with us in the country this summer, and who, although he has 15 acres here to play and explore in, rarely goes outside on his own. Too boring. When he first came, he could not tell a daisy from a sunflower, but has gradually learned some basics about the outdoors. Today, we both looked up an unfamiliar purple flower and learned it was a species of vervain. When we are outside, we watch things happening in nature, such as bees pollenating squash flowers or wasps hunting caterpillars among the broccoli -- things he would never stop and watch on his own. One day, I took him into the back woods and then told him to lead me home. He did -- by following the sound of our roosters crowing and our geese honking. "See?" I said, "You won't get lost if you pay attention to what is around you."
So is it ethical to catch and collect things? I think it depends on how you do it. Certainly it is wrong to pull wings off flies or leave animals starving or dying of boredom in cages. But I see nothing wrong with letting kids keep a toad for a few days, then release it back into it own environment. When I find a snake or turtle, I bring it in the house for the kids to see. Who knows? Maybe the snake benefits spirtually from having helped a child learn more about the world. In the long run, maybe a little reptilian inconvenience now might well save that snake's home in the future.
Monday, July 4, 2011
Where are the Monarch butterflies this year?
Over the years, I have purposely allowed Common Milkweed to naturalize on my land, because it is the food plant of the Monarch butterfly larva. The area where I live is on the migration route and a breeding grounds for the larvae. (In fact, the Monarch is the state butterfly of Minnesota. I consider my place to be a butterfly sanctuary.) The caterpillars will only eat plants in the Milkweed family -- which include not only the Common Milkweed, but also Butterfly Flower ( formerly known as Butterfly Weed, but renamed "flower" by retail greenhouses) and Aesclapia varieties. So it's a good idea to have some of these plants in your butterfly garden if you want to attract Monarchs.
It's hard to say. Did all those fires in the Southwest kill the Monarchs as they migrated from Mexico or the Gulf states? Was the long cold spell here in Minnesota this spring too much for those who did arrive? Are they being killed off by genetically-modified corn pollen from plants with BT (Bacillus thuringensis) built in to kill corn earworms -- and any other caterpillars it comes in contact with? Is climate change upsetting the migration cycle? Is it a combination of all these things? We do know that their wintering habitat in Mexico is shrinking, due to illegal logging of the areas where they normally go. In addition, there are fewer and fewer places for Monarchs to stop along the way.
Monarch butterflies travel north at about 50-100 miles per day. The butterflies don't make a single trip from Mexico to Minnesota. Instead, they breed along the way, then their offspring continue the journey. It take 3 or four generations for them to reach Minnesota from Mexico. In other words, they travel in stages, as spring moves northward and flowers become available for nectaring and Milkweed plants for breeding. You can read more about the migration and see a map at this site: http://www.fs.fed.us/monarchbutterfly/migration/index.shtml.
Even if I could remember the place, I'm not sure that patch of woods still exists. The land is becoming more and more developed along the migration route, with fewer "way stations" for the butterflies to breed and feed. So one way you can help the Monarchs is to plant milkweed for them. Each fall, I harvest the milkweed seeds on my land and sell them in my eBay store, The Happy Rooster, for butterfly gardeners. I have both the Common Milkweed and what I call Swamp Milkweed, the Aesclapia species with the narrower leaves that likes ditches and other damp areas. I do a pretty good business with this, since commercial seed companies don't offer such "weeds" in their catalogs. In this way, I am doing my little bit to help Monarchs survive. You can do the same: Be a good Monarch steward and plant some milkweed in your butterfly garden this fall -- help save our state butterfly.
In past years, I could go out into the field this time of year and, within minutes, find either larvae or eggs from Monarchs, as well as see the females fluttering from plant to plant laying more eggs. This year, zilch, zero, nada. I wanted to find some eggs and/or caterpillars to raise so my little grandson could watch them grow and pupate. A few years ago his older brother, at around age three, was amazed to see an adult Monarch emerge from the pupa. "Butterfly in there!" he exclaimed in delighted surprise. He also delighted in releasing the butterflies. Now his brother is about the same age and spending daycare time with us, so I wanted to do this project again. I went in search of larvae or eggs, but found not a single one. I must have looked under the leaves of a hundred plants or more, with no luck. So what happened?
It's hard to say. Did all those fires in the Southwest kill the Monarchs as they migrated from Mexico or the Gulf states? Was the long cold spell here in Minnesota this spring too much for those who did arrive? Are they being killed off by genetically-modified corn pollen from plants with BT (Bacillus thuringensis) built in to kill corn earworms -- and any other caterpillars it comes in contact with? Is climate change upsetting the migration cycle? Is it a combination of all these things? We do know that their wintering habitat in Mexico is shrinking, due to illegal logging of the areas where they normally go. In addition, there are fewer and fewer places for Monarchs to stop along the way.
| Female Monarch (Photo by Kenneth Dwain Harrelson Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons) |
Only once in my life have I seen a migrating flock passing through Minnesota. It was many years ago, when I was still in college. A fellow student and I were driving along a back country road when the call of nature came, so we pulled over and I went into the woods to pee. Suddenly I was surrounded by fluttering Monarchs. There must have been three or four hundred of them. It was a magical moment I will never forget. I called to my buddy to come see, and he was amazed, too. Of course, I didn't have a camera with me (I never seem to at these moments) so the only record of this event is in my memory - and I don't even remember exactly where it was. But I'll never forget the wonder of it!
Friday, June 10, 2011
Unplugging for God and nature

The past two days were the Jewish festival of Shavuot, which is both the Feast of First Fruits and the commemoration of the giving of the Torah at Mt. Sinai. (For our first fruits, we ate our first leaf lettuce of the year from our garden. In addition to liturgy, we like to tie our holidays in with what is happening in nature.) On the major holy days, as on the Sabbath, religious Jews do not use the phone, computer, TV, CD player, radio, or other electronic communications devices. No texting, blogging, surfing, chatting, gaming, etc. No, we don't turn off the electricity -- the lights and fans were still on -- but we do unplug from the endless chatter of the outside world.
My non-Jewish friends cannot conceive of doing this. "What if there is an emergency? How will people contact you?" Well, if it is really an emergency, then I will hear the sirens, see the tornado, or the police will come to my door. Anything less than that can wait. And you know what? We survive being unplugged just fine. In fact, we more than survive -- we actually enjoy it. Turning off all the human chatter gives us the quiet space to enjoy the natural sounds in the woods around us. Birds, frogs, toads, insects, the rustle of the wind in the leaves -- how can you hear these things if you are always plugged into your ipod?
In 1987, as part of a series of lessons on kabbalah (49 Gates of Light), I wrote the following about Moses and the Burning Bush:
What is genius? Perhaps it is the ability to see familiar things in a new and different way. For example, how long did it take Moses to realize that the burning bush was not being consumed? After all, this was something he had never encountered before. Most of us would probably have glanced at it and said, “Oh look, there's a bush on fire.” Then, shrugging our shoulders, we would have continued on our way. But Moses took a little more time. Turning aside to investigate, he became personally involved. Only then, the Midrash tells us, did God call out, “Moses, Moses.”
The question is, how many other potential prophets have missed their opportunity to receive, simply because they were distracted and did not recognize the vision? In this fast-paced world of ours, it’s so easy to say, “I don't have the time.” Yet in order to receive inspiration, we must be willing to make time for the Creator to speak to us.
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov was fond of saying that a person who does not have an hour of solitude with God each day was not truly human. By this he meant that we were created to be channels of God's blessing. If we do not make time in our lives for this, we are not fulfilling our purpose. To be truly human is to bridge heaven and earth, to join together the spiritual and material worlds. To do this, we must listen to the "still, small voice" speaking to us from the Silence. (From 49 Gates of Light: A course in Kabbalah, 2010 revised edition. Also available as a download on Lulu.com on my Lulu Storefront page.) )
This is even more true today. I recently read about a survey where college students were asked about their use of electronic devices, and a large percentage said they cannot go for more than ten minutes without checking their email or Twitter or whatever. And here I am, turning off the whole Internet for 26 hours every Sabbath, and two days for the Festival of Shavuot. Not only that, but I do not carry a phone everywhere I go, because I don't want to talk to you or anyone else when I am out communing with God and nature.
In his now-classic book, The Sabbath
The Sabbath is based on the Seventh Day of Creation, when God rested. It is not that God got tired. Rather, God ceased creating, thereby making it possible for us to do the same. On the Sabbath, we are not doing our busy-ness. We are free to just be. Try it sometime: Turn off your phone, don't log on, don't play video games or watch TV, etc. for a whole day. Instead, watch and listen to the real world around you. Who knows? You might even discover your own equivalent of a burning bush.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Pileated Woodpecker action on dead trees -- wow!
![]() |
| Pileated Woodpecker (Photo by Noel Lee, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons) |
This illustrates the importance of leaving large dead trees for these big woodpeckers to use. The back five acres of our land are pretty much left as-is, except that I collect firewood there for campfires and maple syrup, and I maintain a trail (which will need some serious work this year. Lots of dead trees and branches came down in the heavy winds we had a while back. And the heavy snow totally flattened the wild raspberries across the trail in places -- that should make picking the fruit interesting this year! On the other hand, it will be easier for the grouse to eat the berries so close to the ground.)

Anyway, back to woodpecker holes. (To see enlarged versions of any of these pix, just click on the picture. I use thumbnails on my blog so it will load faster.)
TREE #1
This tree (on the right) was the first I spotted, and absolutely amazing! Just look at the huge holes the birds have chopped out. There was also one at the top that was a literal trench about 5 feet long! Unfortunately, it did not photograph well, because the sun was behind that side of the tree at the time. But you can guess from these pix that it was HUGE! The top of the tree had also broken and fallen off where the bird had chopped so far through, the tree broke.
This next picture is a closeup of two of the lower holes. Notice that the entire trunk was covered with a small species of shelf fungus. I imagine that had helped to soften up the wood. This is my favorite in this series of photos. There is just so much interesting texture and contrast between the delicate fungi and those big holes!These next two shots are of another tree I found in the same general area, clearly in the territory of the same birds. There were more dead trees with evidence of woodpecker action, but these were the most dramatic. A big pile of wood chips like this was at the bottom of the other tree, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
































